Show Me the Numbers: How a National Financial Services Contact Center Unified Performance Management Across BPOs and Internal Teams
with Contact Center Operations Leader from National Financial Services Contact Center

Company
National Financial Services Contact Center
Industry
Financial Services
Focus
Contact Center Operations & BPO Management
Segment
Enterprise · Multi-Site · Multi-Partner Operations
Products
Performance Management, AI-Enabled Coaching, Data Integration, Gamification & Engagement
Integrations
Eleveo (WFM & Call Recording), Medallia (VOC & CSAT), CRM & CCaaS Platforms, Power BI
90%
of call volume handled by Tier 1 BPO partners in Jamaica and Mexico
6
core metrics unified into a single real-time performance hub
100%
coaching sessions now tracked, documented, and tied to outcomes
1
shared scorecard across internal teams, BPOs, and leadership
Challenge
- Metrics took days to compile, arrived outdated, and different teams produced conflicting versions of the same KPIs from siloed tools like Eleveo, Medallia, and manual QA spreadsheets
- Coaching documentation lived on personal desktops, Word files, and SharePoint folders — making annual reviews a scramble and standardization nearly impossible
- Two new BPO partners were coming online and the team was spending more calories on assembling reports than on driving process improvement
Solution
- AmplifAI unified QA, CSAT, FCR, AHT, transfer rates, productivity, and coaching data from Eleveo, Medallia, and internal systems into one trusted, real-time hub
- Coaching became a tracked, standardized practice — and permissions were extended to QA analysts and training staff, turning development into a shared, cross-functional effort
- BPO partners were onboarded through a deliberate trust-first rollout followed by coaching, operational scorecard planning (OSP) calls, and gamification — creating a unified performance network across borders
Results
- Coaching frequency proved itself as a performance driver — when a temporary QA resource gap reduced coaching coverage, metrics dropped almost immediately, confirming the causal chain
- Agents check their own dashboards daily, request feedback proactively, and understand how their metrics connect to customer outcomes — engagement levels that were previously rare
- BPO sites across Jamaica and Mexico share playbooks with each other and the internal team, learning from high-performing sites and operating as true performance partners rather than isolated vendors
TL;DR
A national financial services contact center unifies performance management across internal teams and BPO partners in Mexico and Jamaica — replacing siloed tools and scattered coaching with a single platform for metrics, accountability, and real-time coaching.
Show Me the Numbers: A Leadership Wake-Up Call
When new leadership took over the contact center operations at a national financial services organization — bringing years of enterprise experience from companies like AIG and Hewlett Packard — their first request was a straightforward one: show me the numbers. Getting that answer turned out to be anything but straightforward.
Different people ran the reporting. The numbers didn't always match. And even when the data arrived, it was already outdated by the time it reached the leadership team's desk. For someone focused on process improvement and project implementation, that delay wasn't just frustrating — it was a structural barrier to making decisions and moving the operation forward.
Distributed Teams Across Borders
The contact center supports a high-volume, multi-tiered service model. Roughly 90% of call volume flows through Tier 1 BPO partners operating in Jamaica and Mexico — the entry point for customers and the foundation for business continuity coverage across time zones. The remaining 10% — complex escalations and back-office work — is handled by an internal Tier 2 team.
The geography is strategic. The operational challenge is keeping everyone on the same page. With people distributed across countries, BPO partners, and internal teams, performance management demands a shared view of what "good" looks like — and a shared way to measure it.
Disconnected Systems, Dispersed Data
The technology environment before AmplifAI reflected years of tool accumulation. Call recording and workforce management lived in Eleveo. Voice of customer, CSAT, agent satisfaction, brand satisfaction, and ease-of-doing-business data sat in Medallia. Manual QA evaluations were done by supervisors and QA analysts in spreadsheets and shared files. CRM, CCaaS, and other infrastructure rounded out the stack — each system serving its purpose, but none of them talking to the others.
The result was a reporting environment that required stitching multiple sources together to see anything clearly. Agents — the people closest to the customer — had limited visibility into the data that defined their own performance. Supervisors had to hunt for what they needed. And leadership was constantly a step behind the operation they were trying to improve.
Why We Needed One Version of the Truth
The decision to implement AmplifAI came from a specific set of operational priorities. Two new BPOs needed to be managed with consistent reporting. The team was spending too many calories building reports by hand rather than driving process improvement. Coaching documentation was scattered across personal desktops, Word files, and SharePoint folders — making annual performance reviews a scramble to find things that should have been in one place.
Everyone was looking for the same thing: one version of the truth. A centralized place for metrics, coaching, recognition, and performance management. And ideally, an engagement layer — gamification and recognition — that made the daily work feel less like compliance and more like a shared mission.
Onboarding BPO Partners: Trust First, Then Coaching
With the platform in place, the next priority was extending the same structure to the BPO partners — the teams handling 90% of call volume. Adoption followed a deliberate, phased journey.
Trust in the data came first. Before anything else, the team validated numbers, explained goal logic, and made sure every BPO understood how performance was measured. If a metric was off by even a little, the team investigated why — because trust in the platform required trust in the math behind it.
Once the BPOs believed the data, the focus shifted to coaching. Operational scorecard planning (OSP) calls brought everyone onto the same line — internal teams, all BPO sites, QA, and training — reviewing the same metrics and learning from each other. Transparency replaced silos. Friendly competition replaced speculation. And gamification layered on top to keep engagement high, creating a "champion challenger" dynamic where sites compete on quality and AHT — with real financial upside for the winners.
During the implementation, the team also moved all BPOs onto a single shared queue instead of dedicated queues per site. That change alone improved efficiency and created a level measurement field where every call was treated the same way regardless of which team answered it.
Six Core Metrics Driving Repeatable Performance
With data unified and performance flowing in real time, the team focused on six metrics that matter most:
- Quality — scored against custom QA forms, the team's top priority
- Average Handle Time (AHT) — balanced against quality, not pursued at its expense; carries direct financial implications for BPO contracts
- Voice of Customer — CSAT, agent satisfaction, brand satisfaction, and ease of doing business, all sourced from Medallia
- First Call Resolution (FCR) — a customer-perspective measure of whether the issue got solved on the first contact
- Transfer Rate — specific to Tier 1 BPOs; rates above 10–13% trigger targeted coaching
- Productivity — specific to internal Tier 2 teams, where lower call volume means productive states matter even when calls aren't coming in
Quality sits at the top. The team is clear that hitting an AHT target doesn't matter if the agent delivered the wrong information or skipped a critical step. Quality has direct consequences for customers, compliance, and long-term retention — and the metrics strategy reflects that priority.
On top of these operational metrics, the team also treats coaching frequency and coverage as leading indicators in their own right. The causal chain proved itself when a temporary QA resource gap caused coaching to dip — metrics dropped almost immediately. That moment confirmed the underlying principle: coaching drives performance.
Different Roles, Different Uses, Same Platform
One of the platform's biggest wins is that different roles get what they need from the same source.
Supervisors use AmplifAI to coach — pulling up agent scorecards, documenting sessions, and planning the next conversation. And because QA analysts and training staff were granted coaching permissions, development work isn't limited to one role. The teams closest to the agents — watching their calls, seeing their gaps — can coach directly when it's timely.
For senior leaders, the analytics suite and Power BI integration bring everything into one consolidated view. They can compare across programs, track trends, and adjust goals without waiting for a custom report. Every role gets the view they need — from agent dashboards for self-coaching to executive reporting for strategic planning.
A Culture Where Coaching Comes First
What began as a technology deployment quickly became a cultural shift. Coaching became a daily habit. Recognition got woven into the workflow. Performance conversations moved from vague to data-driven and actionable.
Agents now check their dashboards daily. They ask for feedback. They know what coaching they've had and what's coming. And because the BPO sites post the customer's logo visibly in their own operations, the team-of-teams ethos is clear: everyone is here to serve the same customer.
The cultural shift isn't only internal. Across the BPO network, sites share playbooks. A high-performing site walks others through its approach. Another site tries it, tweaks it, and improves. No one is operating in a silo. Everyone is contributing to — and learning from — the same shared performance playbook.
Even specific process improvements proved the model. Rolling out a new knowledge bank drove quality metrics up directly, giving the team a concrete example of how platform-wide visibility plus coaching translates into frontline outcomes.
One Version of the Truth
The leader driving this transformation has spent a career in enterprise operations at organizations like AIG and Hewlett Packard — environments where the hunt for one version of the truth was a constant theme. AmplifAI is the first platform that delivered on that aspiration.
Before, the team spent its energy stitching together reports. Now, it spends that energy improving outcomes. That's the shift. And at the core of it is a simple principle: it's always been about the agent. AmplifAI gave the team the visibility, the structure, and the momentum to act like it.
Key Takeaways
Data trust comes first — teams won't act on metrics they don't believe, so phased rollouts that validate numbers and explain goal logic build the foundation for everything else
Coaching frequency is a leading indicator of performance — the team proved it in real time when a temporary QA resource gap reduced coaching and metrics fell almost immediately
BPO partners must operate on the same platform, scorecards, and coaching standards as internal teams to create a truly unified performance network across geographies
Extending coaching responsibility beyond supervisors to QA analysts and training staff turns development into a shared, embedded practice rather than a single point of failure
Quality is the lead metric, not handle time — hitting AHT targets means nothing if agents give wrong information or skip critical steps that impact customer outcomes
Moving all BPO sites onto a single shared queue during implementation created a level measurement field and eliminated the operational overhead of managing separate queues per site
Agents who can see their own metrics and customer feedback become self-correcting — checking dashboards daily and requesting coaching rather than waiting for it